Вход на гидру онион hydra4center com

Synal

Специалист
Подтвержденный
Сообщения
396
Реакции
35
Уважаемые пользователи RuTOR , Все сайты из нашего списка проверены и находятся онлайн, их нет в скам листах. Остерегайтесь фишинг сайтов и помните об уголовной ответственности за незаконные сделки. Подборка официальных сайтов по продаже веществ от форума Rutor носит исключительно информативный характер.

1. OMG!OMG - MOST ADVANCED DARKMARKET

Эта площадка существует довольно давно и в этот период она медленно развивалась в тени гидры. В настоящее время это ведущий сайт по продаже веществ в даркнете.
 

 

2. MEGA - DARKNET MARKET

Благодаря хорошей подготовке и листингу на зарубежных сайтах площадка смогла составить конкуренцию в стабильности и доступности, чего не смогли ее конкуренты, но все же она уступает по полпулярности площадке OMG!OMG!

 

3. HYDRA - Возрождение легенды.

Идут работы по восстановлению всеми любимой гидры, но все не так просто как казалось ранее, совсем скоро она будет доступна, а сейчас нам остается только ждать релиза от команды HYDRA.

 

________________________
RUTOR — Главная торговая и информационная площадка в сети Tor.



I

Itoqe

Местный
Сообщения
89
Реакции
6
Вход на гидру онион hydra4center com
Do you visit omg sites? Have you ever had a problem finding the right link? Are you afraid to click on the wrong link and lose your data or funds? We have answers to all these questions and we can help com you.Direct link to omg - omgruzxpnew4af.onionThe official mirror of omg - omg4jpwhfx4mst onionDo not enter your personal data when registering on omg. We recommend ссылка creating usernames and passwords where you haven't used them anywhere. For the safety of your funds and personal data, we strongly recommend checking the links you follow. The omgruzxpnew4af onion website is not responsible for your money and personal data, and if you go to the wrong site you will not be able to get your money back. Be vigilant and attentive. Happy shopping!omgruzxpnew4af mirrorIn any case, the omg site is one of the safest sites on the Darknet network where you can make purchases, and which boasts the widest assortment. Undoubtedly, attention should be paid to your safety and the ability to remain incognito. To do this, the creators of the site have come up with a wonderful tool - onion routing. Thanks to this action when you connect a chain is created that hides your external IP address and you remain incognito. For the safest use of the omgruzxpnew4af mirror you will need to install a TOR browser for yourself, for this you need to download the archive, install the program on your PC and get to work.
 
O

Omyby

Пассажир
Сообщения
32
Реакции
11
IniciocabañaskayakspaddlesurfContactoCambiarnavegación IniciocabañaskayakspaddlesurfContactoDescubre el Negratín, un lugar único en elmundo...Corazón del GeoparqueActividades y alojamientoKAYAKSPADDLESURFCABAÑASElNegratínCorazón del Geoparque deGranadaDescubra el entorno del embalse del Negratín(Altiplano de Granada), un lugar único en el mundo, con paisajesimpresionantes que nos recordarán al Cañón del Colorado.Alojamientos trogloditas o casascueva, cabañas y la mejor oferta enturismo activo de la comarca: piragüismo, kayaks, paddlesurf,caballos, tiro con arco, etc.Recomendamos visitar las cárcavas del Negratínimpresionantes formaciones geológicas características dellugar.El embalse del Negratín, llamado “el mar delAltiplano” es uno de los mayores de Andalucía, en él, se puedenpracticar diversos deportes náuticos, como vela, piragüismo,kayaks, paddlesurf, etc, así mismo podremos practicar el deporte dela pesca (Black Bass).Una de sus peculiaridades es el color azul de susaguas que contrastan con los tonos ocres de susladeras.Nuestras cabañas están situadas cerca de la presadel embalse.piragüismo gratis alquilando 2 diasrío Castril Guazalamanco, miradornegratíndescubre sitios increibles cueva del aguaBonos [email protected] tlf 666 086 039TurismoNegratinPáginasBonos verano2021cabañas NegratíncontactoEl NegratínEl Negratín,corazón del GeoparquePacksPlaces tovisitPolítica deprivacidadrutasvisitarbonos veranopaddlesurf Negratinpiraguas negratin
Вход на гидру онион hydra4center com
 
V

Vydawif

Пассажир
Сообщения
29
Реакции
5
Managing and Monitoring Landscapes Protecting and improving land health requires comprehensive landscape management strategies. Land managers have embraced a landscape-scale philosophy and have developed new methods to inform decision making such as satellite imagery to assess current conditions and detect changes, and predictive models to forecast change. The Landscape Toolbox is a coordinated system of tools and methods for implementing land health monitoring and integrating monitoring data into management decision-making.The goal of the Landscape Toolbox is to provide the tools, resources, and training to land health monitoring methods and technologies for answering land management questions at different scales.Nelson Stauffer Uncategorized 0The core methods described in the Monitoring Manual for Grassland, Shrubland, and Savanna Ecosystems are intended for multiple use. Each method collects data that can be used to calculate multiple indicators and those indicators have broad applicability. Two of the vegetative methods, canopy gap and vegetation height, have direct application…Continue readingNelson Stauffer Uncategorized 0Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Control (QC) are both critical to data quality in ecological research and both are often misunderstood or underutilized. QA is a set of proactive processes and procedures which prevent errors from entering a data set, e.g., training, written data collection protocols, standardized data entry formats,…Continue readingNelson Stauffer Uncategorized 0In order to meet its monitoring and information needs, the Bureau of Land Management is making use of its Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring strategy (AIM). While taking advantage of the tools and approaches available on the Landscape Toolbox, there are additional implementation requirements concerning the particulars of sample design, data…Continue readingNelson Stauffer Methods Guide, Monitoring Manual, Training 0We’ve added two new videos demonstrating and explaining the Core Methods of Plant species inventory and Vegetation height to our collection. These are two methods that previously didn’t have reference videos, although the rules and procedures for both can be found in volume I of the Monitoring Manual for Grassland, Shrubland,…Continue readingSarah McCord Methods Guide, Monitoring Manual, Training 0Question: Are succulents counted as a woody species when measuring vegetation heights? Answer: Yes. Succulent plant species are considered to be woody in contrast to herbaceous because their function is more similar to woody vegetation than herbaceous vegetation in many applications of these data. From a wildlife viewpoint: Some succulents are…Continue readingNelson Stauffer Blog, News, Presentations 0The 68th annual Society for Range Management meeting held in the first week of February 2015 in Sacramento, California was a success for the Bureau of Land Management’s Assessment, Inventory, and Monitoring (AIM) strategy. Staff from the BLM’s National Operations Center and the USDA-ARS Jornada hosted a day-long symposium to…Continue readingJason Karl Blog, Sample Design sample design, sampling 0What is an Inference Space? Inference space can be defined in many ways, but can be generally described as the limits to how broadly a particular results applies (Lorenzen and Anderson 1993, Wills et al. in prep.). Inference space is analogous to the sampling universe or the population. All these…Continue readingNelson Stauffer Blog, Monitoring Tools & Databases, News 0A new version of the Database for Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessment has just been released! This latest iteration—as always—aims to improve stability and reliability for field data collection on a tablet and data report generation in the office. For more information about DIMA and how it fits into project designs,…Continue readingJason Karl Blog, News 0In compiling information for the redesign of the Landscape Toolbox website and the second edition of the Monitoring Manual, I kept referring back to a small set of seminal references. These are my “Go-To” books and papers for designing and implementing assessment, inventory, and monitoring programs and for measuring vegetation…Continue readingJason Karl Blog, News 0We’re excited to show off the new redesign of the Landscape Toolbox. We’re in the middle of not only refreshing the website, but also completely overhauling the content and how it’s organized in the Toolbox. This version of the Toolbox is draft at this point and is evolving rapidly. Take…Continue reading
 
O

Ovola

Пассажир
Сообщения
54
Реакции
3
Securing services requires a broad range of knowledge of operating systems, networking, protocols and offensive capabilities. So I thought I would demonstrate some testing methods to show how a control is effective in blocking certain types of attack, so here’s some offensive and defensive guidance to limit RDP attacks. Please remember this is for educational purposes, do NOT break the law and only use these techniques where you have permission! #whitehatThis document provides a sample of the internal (white box) testing process and procedure for testing RDP controls against brute force attacks.Demonstrate only authorised users can access the serviceDemonstrate Remote Desktop Services has a hardened configurationDemonstrate a brute force attackScope EvaluationTestingEnumerationVulnerably AssessmentExploitationReport ResultsKali LinuxNMAP – https://tools.kali.org/information-gathering/nmapomg – https://tools.kali.org/password-attacks/omgCROWBAR – https://github.com/galkan/crowbarWindows PowerShellhttps://tools.kali.org/tools-listingPerspectiveThis control demonstration is being conducted from the perspective of a compromised internal network host. This configuration required disabling the distributed firewall control.The testing is being conducted in a white box scenario where full system information and configurations are available to the tester.Test InformationTest conducted by: Daniel CardTest date: xx/xx/XxxxTest ScopeThe following tests have been included/excluded:TestIncludedConfiguration AuditYesRDP Protocol ConfigurationAuthorised User AuditYesHPA Group Audit – PowershellEnumerationYesNMAP ScanDemonstrate Vulnerability/Attack on Vulnerable HostNoOut of scopeVulnerability AssessmentYesNessus Scan Report (separate document)Authorised Access TestYesDemonstration of serviceCompromised CredentialsNoOut of scopeAuthentication FailureYesLog in with incorrect passwordUnauthorised AccessNoDemonstrated through brute force attackData in Transit EncryptedYesPacket capture and configurationDenial of ServicePartialAccount lockout testing via brute forceBrute Force AttackYesomg, CROWBARMan in the middle Attack (MitM)NoDemonstrated through secure configuration and PCAPProtocol/Encryption DowngradeNoDemonstrated through secure configurationWeb Application Assessment (OWASP TOP 10)NoN/AKnown Vulnerability ExploitationNoCredential audit shows no known vulnerabilitiesPrivilege EscalationNoOut of scopeLateral MovementNoN/AAntimalwareNoOut of scopeData ExfiltrationNoOut of scopeHigh Privilege Group EnumerationOnly administrator users can access Remote Desktop Services service.Configuration AuditThe following screenshot demonstrates the security configuration of the remote desktop service protocol on an RDP enabled server in the Precise environment:We can see from this configuration the following:RDP Protocol is running “Microsoft RDP 8.0”RDP Encryption is required (demonstrated by MinEncryptionLevel = 3)User authentication is enabled (UserAuthenticationRequired = 1)EnumerationNmap is utilised to enumerate the target:We can see remote desktop services is open on port 3389Demonstrate ServiceSuccessful Authentication (Windows Client)Successful Authentication (Kali Linux)./xfreerdo /u:TESTDOMAIN\\admindc /p:[password] +nego /v:[targetIP]Unauthorised Access DeniedFailed AuthenticationTransport EncryptionAs demonstrated in the below screenshot RDP traffic is encrypted during transit.ExploitationBrute Force AttackAttack Tool: CrowBarhttps://github.com/galkan/crowbarAttack command:./crowbar.py -b rdp -s 10.xx.xx.xx/32 -u [email protected] -C /root/Desktop/tests/hyda_rdp/rock.txtCrowbar AttackTarget Event LogThe event log show’s account lockout after 10 unsuccessful attempts:ResultThe attack was unsuccessful the account was locked out.Attack Tool: HyrdaAttack Complexity: ModerateThis attack will leverage omg to conduct a brute force attack against the RDP service using a known wordlist and secondly specific test credentials.omg -t 1 -V -f -l administrator -P rockyou.txt rdp://192.168.1.1hdya = app-t 1 = tasks value (1 for vm – higher for physical)-V = Verbose-f = quit if successfully login-l administrator = username-P rockyou.txt = the wordlist you want to useRdp://192.168.1.1 = target-s 4000 = alternate TCP port e.g. TCP 4000ResultA dictionary based attack was launched:To save time (since we know the password of the account) we setup a concurrent test:This test, even with the known credential fails.This testing demonstrates that denial of service by account locket does not occur as demonstrated by the screenshot of the account properties post attack (denial of service prevented)This test demonstrated the configuration of RDP has a hardened configuration.Network Level Authentication is enabledUnencrypted Brute force attacks fail even with known credentialsBrute force attacks are possible from a compromised foothold, however the attack surface in the environment is limited by use of jump boxesAccounts lockout after ten failed attemptsThe SSL Certificate is locally signedAttack/Vulnerability ProfileCVSS Base Score3.0 (Low)Vector StringCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L/E:H/RL:W/RC:C/AR:L/MAV:N/MAC:H/MPR:H/MUI:R/MS:U/MC:N/MI:N/MA:HTemporal Score3.0 (Low)Environment Score2.3 (Low)Residual Risks‘Low and Slow’ brute force attacks are possible if the attacker can gain a foothold and maintain connection to a command and control server; however, security monitoring and the range of layered controls reduces the probability and impact of the event occurring.RecommendationsUse certificates issued by a certificate authority (internal or public CA)This is in scope for design, however was not configured at time of testingConsider using a nonstandard port for remote desktop servicesConsider using RDP Gateway (not currently in scope of design)Restrict access through firewalls to authorised endpoints (in design)Restrict remote desktop groups to authorised usersEnforce strong passwordsUse good practise account lockout
 
Сверху Снизу